Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/28/13 in all areas

  1. 1 point
    it is announced at ROGUE one-man live "BLACK & FLAG" at Ikebukuro EDGE at 2013/08/25 that their new one-coin single "LUMINOUS" will be sold in advance at their free one-man live "ZERO" at Ikebukuro BLACK HOLE at 2013/12/16 (1 song, 500yen)
  2. 1 point
    PENICILLIN new maxi single "幻想カタルシス(gensou katharsis)" will be released at 2013/10/09 (3 TYPE, 2 songs, 1,300yen each)
  3. 1 point
    Considering that this has been a rather big issue within the online VK community, both on forums as on other websites like livejournal, tumblr etc. I thought it would be interesting to try and get some opinions on the matter. If you decide to share VK music online, this usually gets reposted on a lot of visual kei blogspots. Now my question is, would you rather have it that blogspots repost your links and credit you/don't credit you (the way it mostly goes now), reupload your files and credit you/don't credit you, or would you prefer that they just keep their hands off? I personally have never really shared anything I got (slow shipping times, lol), but if it came to it, I guess I'd prefer reuploading over reposting. You can't really stop the blogs from taking "your stuff" (though that is a entirely other debate) anyway, it comes with the territory if you put it on the net. Reuploading at least keeps the links alive. What I dislike about reposting links (especially with bigger artists that get deleted quicker) is that when the file gets removed for violation (like what happened with GazettE's DIVISION) the file is nowhere left to be found because everyone just blatantly reposted the link. Reuploading keeps the files alive and easier to access. Plenty of uploaders request for their files to be reuploaded instead of reposted, though I don't get why blogs (I'm looking at you edohsama and visual scandal) don't take 5 extra minutes to reupload the file if the uploader wishes so. Credits I don't care about at all, like you'd want your name all over the net being associated with sharing stuff online anyway. So what is your opinion on the matter? Also, feel free to discuss the opinions of others!
  4. 1 point
    ex-UnsraW Vo.勇企(yuuki) session "-273.15℃" (pronounced as "絶対零度(zettaireido)") live-limited single "THE PROOF" will be released at ベルベット(VelBet) PRESENTS PREMIUM GANG NIGHT "BLOODY [R] BIRTHDAY Vol.3" at Takadanobaba AREA at 2013/09/04 "-273.15℃" members: Vo.勇企(yuuki) (ex-UnsraW) Gt.暁(satoshi) (D.I.D.) Gt.沙瑛(sae) (AUBE) Ba.猟平(ryouhei) (ベルベット(VelBet)) Dr.哲也(tetsuya) (ex-SKULL)
  5. 1 point
    The only thing that sounded strange was the mixing,I think they tried to put the vocals too much in front. IMO,Kamijo's solo debut is a lot better than Jupiter.
  6. 1 point
    I'm guessing the second word means 伝承 (denshou), meaning "Legend" or "lore". So it's 幻夢伝承 = Mugen Denshou = Dream Legend.
  7. 1 point
    The third -might- be 伝Kind of at a loss for the last one at the moment.
  8. 1 point
    As a former vkei blog updater (which is actually how I met Sai ) , I reuploaded everything 85% of the time. At one point, I stopped because I wanted more traffic and to seem like a ~visual-cool~ contributer, but that was a very shortlived phase. When uploading a discography, I even took the time to write a description of the band and what kind of music they made to get people more interested in trying them out instead of blinding posting everything I found. From what I've seen, I was a pretty rare case. Today, very few people really write much about what they're sharing (assuming it's something they like. When I uploaded new, popular stuff that I didn't care about whatsoever [like ViViD at the time], I wouldn't give a description) and fewer people upload things themselves. This leads to dozens of blogs with dead links for the same thing and makes things that should be really easy to come across impossible to find. At least Jrockvisualkei dot com (I think that's their name) took the time to reupload everything to several different hosting sites. I'm not saying people should always write a synopsis of what they're uploading, but it certainly does help get me interested and it shows that you're passionate about this release instead of just sharing to share. I am saying that blogs should at least upload everything to their own direct download sites in addition to copying and pasting someone else's links so we don't have the same dead link all over the place. UNRELATED BUT THIS SHIT NEEDS TO STOP Uploading singles / demos from older discographies and filling in the tracks with album versions. This warps history and is completely wrong. I used to do it as a shortcut myself, but then I realized what it was doing. It's better to say "track missing" or not even mention that this demo or single was released on your post if you don't have the real version. I cannot tell you how it pisses me off when I like the way a song sounds in a music video, but when I download it the uploader put the album version (which is usually stripped of some sort of intro or remastered in some way unless you're on UCP) instead. Latest example (from like a year ago, huehue) was Dir en Gray's "Myaku." I don't believe the single I got even had the B-sides, and the title track even had Macabre tags. Really?
  9. 1 point
    sai

    2013 so far...the good, the bad, the WTF!

    Making a new list (I'm too lazy to write down the releases I enjoyed for threads like these, lol). Alice Nine - DAYBREAK Alice Nine - SHADOWPLAY AI - Voice Boris - Präparat EXO - The 1st Album 'XOXO' (Repackage) f(x) - Pink Tape (Vol. 2) LAGITAGIDA - TUTELA!! LUNA SEA - Thoughts lynch. - Ballad M-Koda - Generating Arrow Diagram MERRY - 梟 THE NOVEMBERS - Fourth Wall ONE OK ROCK - 人生x僕= SHINee - BOYS MEET U SHINee -Dream Girl - The misconceptions of you 凛として時雨 - i'mperfect 雅-MIYAVI- - MIYAVI 9GOATS BLACK OUT - Archives (it counts in my book ok)
  10. 1 point
    I don't care about credits, I think it's pretty laughable. If I upload something I'm not entitled to anything, it's just some other people's music that I happened to buy and share. I'm okay with whichever (reposting or reupping) since it makes no difference to me (I already own the stuff, so xD) - tho for longevity and bigger exposure to the release in question, it's better if people reuploaded the given file: more links means an increased possibility of actually being able to download something instead of seeing the same dead link over and over again everywhere.
  11. 1 point
    ^ Yeah, it came out today.
  12. 1 point
    sai

    LYNCH EXODUS EP

    Agreeing with Saku, tbqh I don't hear what you guys are all complaining about. You act like this stuff was recorded with a toilet but apart from the guitars being a bit muddled in the mix I don't think it's really THAT bad. I've heard way worse mixing with bands that had an even higher budget, so this is hardly unlistenable. Overall I didn't really like this EP. I'm going to explain why but you probably won't be able to follow my logic but gomen i only slept 3 hours lol. lynch.' main problem is that they don't know what direction they want to go in. Or perhaps they do know, but they aren't pulling it off properly yet. Inferiority Complex and EXODUS are both releases that showed the more "metal-like" direction of lynch., in comparison to I BELIEVE IN ME, LIGHTNING and BALLAD. The main problem of EXODUS is that they're trying to advance from Inferiority Complex, yet the poppy hooks they incorporate in their music are ALWAYS there. I doubt they keep them in for the sake of commercialism (seeing how EXODUS as a whole is not commercial at all), but the feeling I get is that lynch. doesn't know or understand yet how they can take the step to a full metal band. Not sure if that's what they want themselves or if it's the direction King Records is pushing them in, but they haven't mastered it yet and that's why I didn't like EXODUS. The main problem is how disjointed the songs sound. I'm going to take ASHES as an example. ASHES starts with a really melodic, light intro that reminds me of their BALLAD single, then progresses into heavier sections with lots of metal elements. The chorus is more sped up, yet is too poppy to really fit in with the rest of the metal elements. However, in the middle of the song the light melodic riffs come back followed by the chorus once again, and in an instant the chorus sounds so much better when mixed with these lighter parts! It's like listening to two separate songs that don't flow well together. You can hate on BE STRONG, but it's the only song on the EP that has one tempo and no aggressive parts, which actually makes it one of the better songs on the EP (not that I really like it THAT much, but I enjoyed listening to it more than the other songs). NIGHT is the song where lynch. does it right. The metal-like parts and the poppy hooks flow into eachother nicely and it's a track I would've seen on I BELIEVE IN ME. NIGHT therefore is the only track on this EP that I really enjoy. Imo lynch. is at their best when it comes to songs like NIGHT, MIRRORS, I BELIEVE IN ME, BALLAD etc. I can understand people want to see them go a more metal-direction, but I'd prefer them not to, because they obviously haven't mastered it yet (and I don't like those songs anyway so I have no objections against another I BELIEVE IN ME).
  13. 1 point
    Original Saku

    LYNCH EXODUS EP

    Well Iv'e only listened to it once so far, But I can tell you I don't hate any of the songs, so that's good I suppose. I really didn't notice the crappy mixing / production everyone is going on about, but that could change with time. I need to listen more and then I can properly evaluate this ep, but so far my impressions are pretty good
  14. 1 point
    eehh...I'm not really interesting so far '_'
  15. 1 point
    I used to have favorite bands and I still do consider a selected few as being my absolute favorites, but lately I tend to think of my favorite music more in terms of albums. I find that it's very hard for a band to consistently release quality material or at least a majority of it (quality as in being to my liking since there's a lot of subjectivity involved in what constitutes a quality release). There are bands that almost always release stuff I absolutely love (ex. The Birthday Massacre, DEG, Ling Tosite Sigure), but there are also bands who have certain releases I really enjoyed, but not necessarily all their stuff is that good in my eyes. I tend to think most bands fall in the last category for me, hence why my favorite music is usually certain albums and less certain bands. When it comes to my favorite bands, yes, I have trouble picking an absolute favorite album since I love them all. As for genres, I like a lot of them, but there's also quite a lot of stuff I don't like in almost all of them so they're not that representative for my music taste. Also there are genres that I usually dislike but there's still one or two bands I find amazing in that particular genre. I use genres as vague indicators for what I might like, but ultimately the sound of that particular band is what matter the most.
×
×
  • Create New...